Last updated: September 2026
The Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS), developed by Spaeth and colleagues, remains a clinically useful, exam-based method for grading optic disc damage — it groups damage into severity categories useful for both diagnosis and monitoring change over time, and it doesn't require any equipment beyond a slit lamp and fundus lens.
| Stage | NW* Small Disc | NW* Average Disc (1.50-2.00mm) | NW* Large Disc (>2.00mm) | Functional correlate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.5 or more | 0.4 or more | 0.3 or more | Not definitely damaged |
| 2 | 0.4-0.49 | 0.3-0.39 | 0.2-0.29 | Not definitely damaged |
| 3 | 0.3-0.39 | 0.2-0.29 | 0.1-0.19 | Not definitely damaged |
| 4 | 0.2-0.29 | 0.1-0.19 | Less than 0.1 | Not definitely damaged |
| 5 | 0.1-0.19 | Less than 0.1 | 0 for <45° | Asymptomatic glaucoma damage, minimal or no visual field defect |
| 6 | Less than 0.1 | 0 for <45° | 0 for 46-90° | Asymptomatic damage, visual field defect always present |
| 7 | 0 for <45° | 0 for 46-90° | 0 for 91-180° | Asymptomatic damage, moderate or more advanced field defect |
| 8 | 0 for 46-90° | 0 for 91-180° | 0 for 181-270° | Glaucomatous disease/disability |
| 9 | 0 for 91-180° | 0 for 181-270° | 0 for >270° | Glaucomatous disease/disability |
| 10 | 0 for >180° | 0 for >270° | — | Glaucomatous disease/disability |
*NW = narrowest width of the neuroretinal rim (rim-to-disc ratio). Note: the scale accounts for the rim width but not its location — location of narrowing matters clinically, especially early on, in distinguishing a true glaucomatous notch from a physiological/anatomic variant.
OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell analysis have become the dominant quantitative tools for structural glaucoma assessment in well-resourced settings — offering reproducible, database-normed measurements that a clinical scale cannot match. That said, DDLS retains real practical value: it requires no equipment beyond a slit lamp, remains useful when OCT is unavailable or unreliable (e.g., high myopia with atypical disc anatomy, poor image quality), and reinforces disciplined clinical disc examination skills that shouldn't atrophy just because OCT exists. Residents should be comfortable with both — DDLS as a clinical exam skill, OCT RNFL/GCC as the quantitative gold standard where available.
Key reference: Spaeth GL, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002.
📘 Want the exam-ready deep dive? This topic is covered in iNotes 2027: Glaucoma (Ophthalmology Postgraduate Exam Notes) — available on Kindle. See all my books.
Want to know more about treatment? Read about Glaucoma Treatment at Sadbhaav or book a consultation with Dr. Dhaval Patel.